The legal test for repudiation of a contract arising out of fundamental breach is not in dispute. Counsel for both parties cited and relied on Smith v. Lau, 2004 BCCA 443, at para. 41 (per Madam Justice Levine, dissenting in the result), where the law was summarized as follows: a fundamental breach is one going to the very root of the contract; where one party fails to perform the very purpose for which the contract is designed so as to deprive the other of the whole or substantially the whole of the benefit which the parties intended should be conferred and obtained, such breach goes to the very root of the contract, and the party not in default is absolved from performing his end of the contract.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.