Does the Law Society have the onus on proving the alleged facts on a balance of probabilities?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Straith (Re), 2020 LSBC 11 (CanLII):

It is well established that the Law Society bears the onus of proving the alleged facts on a balance of probabilities and that the alleged conduct amounts to, in this case, professional misconduct: Law Society of BC v. Golden, 2018 LSBC 38, at para. 23.

Other Questions


What is the standard of proof for a plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical event is not a probability, not a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether past events such as negligence and causation must be proved on a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove past events such as negligence on a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving failure or refusal on the balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving on a balance of probabilities that the assumptions were wrong? (British Columbia, Canada)
What must a plaintiff have to prove on a balance of probabilities that their injuries would not have occurred “but for” the accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a strata corporation required to prove on a balance of probabilities that repairs are necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What must a plaintiff have to prove on a balance of probabilities the causal connection between accident-related injuries and impairment of his ability to work? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a party who alleges fraudulent misrepresentation have to prove that the misrepresentation is not a "material fact" in order to succeed in their claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to prove that loss of future income is probable? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.