What is the standard of proof for a plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical event is not a probability, not a balance of probabilities?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kelly v Kalra, 2019 BCSC 1305 (CanLII):

In Reilly v. Lynn, 2003 BCCA 49 at para. 101, Low J.A. observed, “The standard of proof in relation to future events is simple probability, not the balance of probabilities, and hypothetical events are to be given weight according to their relative likelihood”. The task of the court is to assess the losses, not to mathematically calculate them.

Other Questions


What is the standard of proof required for a plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical event occurred at the same time as an actual event? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof for a plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical event will not affect his claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a plaintiff to prove hypothetical events? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required to prove that a hypothetical past event has occurred? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove past events such as negligence on a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a plaintiff to prove they have been diagnosed with motor neurone disease? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof for a hypothetical event? (British Columbia, Canada)
What standard of proof does a hypothetical event meet? (British Columbia, Canada)
In assessing damages for lost earning capacity, does the court have to consider hypothetical events that need not be proven on a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof in relation to hypothetical or future events? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.