What is the test for admissibility of statements by an accused?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Hayes, 1982 ABCA 30 (CanLII):

The starting point for any decision as to the admissibility of statements by an accused is the judgment of Lord Sumner in Ibrahim v. The King, [1914] A.C. 599. At p. 609 he stated: “It has long been established as a positive rule of English criminal law, that no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence against him unless it is shewn by the prosecution to have been a voluntary statement, in the sense that it has not been obtained from him either by fear of prejudice or hope of advantage exercised or held out by a person in authority.”

Other Questions


Can a judge have found that all three of the statements made by the accused were compelled? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the grounds of appeal for the admissibility of two statements that were submitted to the jury after voir dires? (Alberta, Canada)
Is evidence of a statement made to a witness by a person who was not himself called as a witness admissible? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the difference between inconsistent statements and admissions? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a person who makes a false statement have to make good the damage caused by the false statement? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a plaintiff amend their statement of claim to add a new cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the position of the accused in the context of medical marijuana use? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will an insurer be able to proceed with a statement of claim for a motor vehicle accident due to the length of the claimant's claim? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a Defendant ask for all facts you know about impairment in a Statement of Claim? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the implications of the partial discontinuance and proposed amendments to the statement of claim? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.