What are the implications of the partial discontinuance and proposed amendments to the statement of claim?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from 864503 Alberta Ltd v Genco Place Properties Ltd, 2016 ABQB 163 (CanLII):

A partial discontinuance (which, as “amended”, discontinues as against all but three defendants) and the proposed amendments to the statement of claim (which abandons claims by all but one plaintiff) have eliminated the Foss v. Harbottle concern, but there remains a potential costs award in favour of the parties who were sued and then who were dropped from the claim.

Other Questions


Can a plaintiff amend his Statement of Claim to add a defendant to his Claim? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the relationship requirement for an amended statement of claim apply to the administrators of the named defendant’s estate? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case where a motion for leave to amend was considered only of the existing pleadings and the proposed amendments? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be allowed to amend his Statement of Claim? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will an insurer be able to proceed with a statement of claim for a motor vehicle accident due to the length of the claimant's claim? (Alberta, Canada)
Is the pleading as amended to a Statement of Claim striking as disclosing no cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for an application to amend the statement of claim in the Abacus litigation? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a plaintiff amend their statement of claim to add a new cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
Can plaintiffs amend their statement of claim in response to an application under rule 129? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a statement of claim that there has been unjust enrichment with no explanation of why the facts might justify the claim? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.