Is there a presumption of judicial impartiality?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from St. Lewis v. Rancourt, 2012 ONSC 6768 (CanLII):

There is a strong presumption in favour of the impartiality of the trier of fact. Where a party seeks the recusal or disqualification of a judge, allegations of judicial bias will have to overcome the strong presumption of judicial impartiality. See Bailey v. Barbour, supra, at para. 19. Analysis

Other Questions


What is the strength of the presumption of judicial impartiality? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for judicial impartiality? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a presumption that badges of fraud constitute a presumption of intent to defraud, defeat or delay creditors? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a judicial impartiality? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for an arbitrator who acts in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the presumption of impartiality of a trier of fact in a motion seeking the recusal or disqualification of a judge? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a unionized employee bring an application for judicial review of an arbitration award? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for rebutting the presumption of not intending to drive? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the statutory and presumptive range of the statutory interest rate for income tax purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
In support of a joint family plan, does the Child and Family Services Act, R.O. 1990, c.61(2) make a presumption in favour of a community or kin plan? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.