With regard to the question of the meaning of the term “continuing contravention”, I am satisfied that the HRT correctly instructed themselves as the law, as reviewed above. I am also satisfied that, based on the authorities, such as I.J. v. J.A.M., 2012 BCSC 892 at para. 41, and Goddard v. Dixon, supra, at para.150-159, that the question of whether a contravention is a continuing contravention is a question of fact or a matter involving a discretionary decision.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.