What is the respondent’s position on curial deference?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Sunshine Coast Conservation Association v. Association of British Columbia Forest Professionals et al, 2005 BCSC 1226 (CanLII):
It is the respondent’s position, relying on Lee v. British Columbia (Attorney General) (2004), 244 D.L.R. (4th) 404, 2004 BCCA 457, that this kind of gate keeper function attracts the highest degree of curial deference.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a respondent respond to an application with a sur-reply responding to new issues raised in reply? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that the respondent did not expect the respondent to pay for the domestic services provided by the Respondent have any impact on an unjust enrichment claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent responded to an application for a change in parenting time? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the grounds for spousal support for a 58-year-old man who, as a result of a long-term relationship with the respondent, has assets that exceed that of the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a Respondent have accepted the jurisdiction of the Court as a result of the Respondent's failure to attend the hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent dealt with a default judgment in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a law firm representing the respondent in a personal injury action be restrained from acting for the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between the original position and the injured position? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate length of notice for a 30 year employee who has been dismissed from his position as a senior management position? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to be put in a position where they would have been in a similar position if they had not been injured in an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
