It is clear from the jurisprudence that the task of the court is to determine whether the hypothetical events have evidentiary support that rises above “mere speculation”. Where a plaintiff has not missed work, but there is evidence that demonstrates a real and substantial possibility that the plaintiff’s chronic pain will affect her ability to work in the future, the plaintiff has met his or her burden: Clark v. Kouba, 2014 BCCA 50 at paras. 32–36.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.