When considering oppressive conduct, the court may consider whether the sale of the home would cause hardship to the opposing party or the children. For example, it would constitute oppressive conduct if the opposing party did not have the ability to find somewhere else to live or the children would be deprived of a place to live: Kaing v. Shaw, 2017 ONSC 3050, 94 R.F.L. (7th) 396, at para. 34.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.