What is the test for a court to exercise inherent jurisdiction?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from H.N.M.L. v. C.P.J.L., 2010 SKQB 456 (CanLII):

Firstly, the court should be careful to ensure that the purported exercise of inherent jurisdiction does not overtly conflict with a statute or rule of law. See Halstead v. Anderson, supra, at paragraph 36.

Other Questions


Does the Court of Appeal have any jurisdiction to interfere in a finding of fact from the lower courts? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the relevant factors that a court will consider in determining whether or not to exercise jurisdiction? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for jurisdiction in a motion brought by the Court of Appeal in the Superior Court of Justice? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can an application to have an action brought in this court dismissed on the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction to hear it? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that the contents of the document can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of the Courts of Equity’s jurisdiction on the terms of a personal injury agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court review a decision by a majority of the Court of Appeal not adjourning on a motion of appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court decline jurisdiction on the basis of forum non conveniens? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will jurisdiction be ousted from an inferior court? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When a vendor contracts to sell to a purchaser an agreement for a lease and the purchaser subsequently repudiates the contract, can the vendor continue to exercise its right to exercise that right? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.