Inasmuch as the temporary orders of Gibson J. and Coats J. were made without prejudice, the test here is not one of a material change in circumstances. Rather, my determination of whether the present access should be increased must be based on my present analysis of the children’s best interests (Ray-Bevington v. Rigden, 2017 ONCJ 602 at para. 29). While Ray-Bevington v. Rigden dealt with a without prejudice order under the Children’s Law Reform Act, the same considerations apply under the Divorce Act.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.