What is the test of evidence at a hearing where the onus of proof is on a balance of probabilities?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Martins and Church v. Buy-Low Foods and another, 2012 BCHRT 296 (CanLII):

The Court of Appeal, in Faryna v. Chorny, had in mind the testing of evidence at trial where the onus of proof would be on a balance of probabilities. Still, the guidance offered is helpful in this s. 27(1)(c) prehearing process, provided a “no reasonable prospect” assessment is made of whether an allegation will be proven on a balance of probabilities.

Other Questions


What is the standard of proof for a plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical event is not a probability, not a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What summary of evidence is admissible as evidence in an extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it appropriate to re-open a hearing to receive oral evidence in cases of conflicting evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an application to reopen a trial to hear further evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove past events such as negligence on a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who has not produced evidence in favour of their position, or has no reasonable explanation for failing to call the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing earnings loss on a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to lead expert evidence to overcome a no evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing on a balance of probabilities that a contract was formed? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.