Can a court find negligence to permit an animal to run at large contrary to a by-law?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Moon v. Stephens, 1915 CanLII 177 (SK CA):

In Baldrey v. Fenton, 1914 CanLII 140 (SK CA), 6 W.W.R. 1441, it was held to be negligence to permit an animal to run at large contrary to a by-law forbidding the allowing of such animal to run at large.

Other Questions


Is it negligent to allow a domestic animal to be at large? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a municipality be held liable for negligence or breach of a by-law where a heifer was running at large contrary to the by-laws of the municipality? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of permitting a bull to be at large? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an auditor liable for negligence of omission or negligence of commission? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of section 4(1) of the Statement of Claimant's Affidavit to the Court of Appeal allowing the Court to consider any evidence which is not confined to facts which the deponent is able to prove? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court review a decision by a majority of the Court of Appeal not adjourning on a motion of appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the legal test for using both a technical and ordinary sense of words in a bylaw or bylaw? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that the contents of the document can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any jurisdiction to interfere in a finding of fact from the lower courts? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that its contents can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.