She submitted that the reduction in the amount of child maintenance would cause undue hardship because it would reduce the standard of living of the children. That situation is not sufficient to constitute the type of undue hardship that permits a departure from the Guidelines: See Hoover v. Hoover, (1997), [1998] N.W.T.R. 209; [1997] N.W.T.J. No. 43 (S.C.) (Q.L.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.