I pause to mention that Nicoll v. Oakes, supra, was a case where, if the respondent succeeded in defeating proof of a will in solemn form, she would be the executrix and principal beneficiary of the estate under an earlier will. The ownership of the asset in question would then most certainly arise. In other words, the applicant had a latent proprietary interest arising as a matter of law in the property in question (some motor vehicles), and she had advanced her claim as far as she properly could at that early stage.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.