What are the implications of an offer to settle in a case involving multiple issues?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Hewett v. Hewett, 2017 BCSC 437 (CanLII):
In James, Gray J. also referred to the decision of Truscott J. in Jukic v. Luta, 2009 BCSC 365 regarding the interrelationship of offers to settle and cases involving multiple issues:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can Rule 37 of the Rules 37 global offer to settle multiple actions heard together? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any evidence that an offer to settle was wholly achieved prior to the delivery of the offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can Rule 37 apply to an offer to settle an issue concerning costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a common issue or issue be tried in advance of individual issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it reasonable for an offeree to refuse an offer to settle where there are many contentious issues to be tried? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of a formal offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for substantial success in cases involving multiple issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an initial and comprehensive settlement offer made by the respondent and a revised offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an offer that does not comply with Rule 37 B constitute an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the legal principles involved in the issue of the issue at bar? (British Columbia, Canada)
