Can Rule 37 of the Rules 37 global offer to settle multiple actions heard together?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Amador v. Hans et al., 2005 BCSC 380 (CanLII):

In contrast, the competing line of authorities suggests that Rule 37 does not permit a global offer to settle multiple actions heard together. The underlying rationale is that such offers are not sufficiently clear and unambiguous: McCallum v. Hough, 2001 BCSC 280 (CanLII).

Other Questions


Is a plaintiff entitled to double costs under Rule 37 of the Rules of Civil Procedure if it makes a single offer to settle two separate actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an offer to settle an action under Rule 9-1(5)(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure available to a litigant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can multiple defendants in a single action make individual offers to settle under Rule 37? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of Rule 37B of the BC Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure on Rule 37 B of the Rules of Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an offer that does not comply with Rule 37 B constitute an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does Rule 37B of the Rules of Civil Procedure require a plaintiff to accept an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does Rule 37B of the BC Civil Rules 37B allow a court to set aside a binding agreement regarding costs and/or an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with motions under Rule 34 and Rule 19(24)(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is Rule 37B of the Rules on costs and offers to settle enforceable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can Rule 37B(5) of the BC SPCA Rules apply to a plaintiff who has made an offer to settle his case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.