Does Rule 37B of the BC Civil Rules 37B allow a court to set aside a binding agreement regarding costs and/or an offer to settle?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Nazmdeh v. Ursel, 2010 BCSC 136 (CanLII):

Further, where, as in this case, an offer to settle has been accepted and the parties have made a binding agreement regarding costs, Rule 37B does not confer a discretion on the court to set aside that agreement: Buttar v. Di Spiritu, 2009 BCSC 72 at paras. 11-17.

Other Questions


In what circumstances has the Court considered an offer to settle a claim for damages under Rule 49 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to double costs under Rule 37 of the Rules of Civil Procedure if it makes a single offer to settle two separate actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted r. 9-1(6) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Civil Procedure in determining whether to accept an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have discretion to order double costs where an offer to settle has been made? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does subrule 18(14) of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to an offer to settle? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a court award double costs of all or some steps taken in a proceeding after the date of delivery or service of a formal offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court award costs under Rule 24(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a family law case? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the court award double costs to a plaintiff who has made an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does Rule 37B of the Rules of Civil Procedure require a plaintiff to accept an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)