What are the implications of a formal offer to settle?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Hanson v Sharma, 2017 BCSC 2310 (CanLII):

Formal offers to settle and informal offers can co-exist on a parallel track with each other. The formal offer to settle is focused on cost consequences. Formal and informal offers may be outstanding at any given time and a party is at liberty to choose either one to bring the litigation to an end: MacKenzie v. Brooks, 1999 BCCA 623 at paras. 24-27.

Other Questions


Can a formal offer to settle be sent to an email address rather than the formal address for delivery? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of an offer to settle in a case involving multiple issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an initial and comprehensive settlement offer made by the respondent and a revised offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the service of a formal offer to settle and the failure of the defence to consent to having the matter proceed by way of Rule 66 constitute "special circumstances" sufficient to require special costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a formal Rule 37 offer and an informal offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any evidence that an offer to settle was wholly achieved prior to the delivery of the offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a formal offer to settle a claim against a plaintiff be apportioned costs based upon division of liability based upon a division of costs based on division of liabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an offer that does not comply with Rule 37 B constitute an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a formal offer to settle on costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate time period for a plaintiff to accept a formal offer to settle their claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.