What is the burden of proving an election was not conducted in accordance with the Elections Act?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Leonard v. Ward, 2003 BCSC 203 (CanLII):
The burden of proof rests on the petitioners to prove the election was not conducted in accordance with the Act: see Giesbrecht v. Chilliwack (1982), 18 M.P.L.R. 27.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a doctor to conduct his practice in accordance with the conduct of an ordinary professional? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a doctor have a duty to conduct his practice in accordance with the conduct of a prudent and diligent doctor in the same circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff has a right to a trial by jury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a plaintiff can work? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving liability and quantum in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a party to a child was not aware of the consequences of the child’s parents’ actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a transfer of funds to a different party when the transfer is not a gift? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that Victoria is a child of the marriage to the Respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving prejudice against a cricket association? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal burden to prove the knowledge and approval of the testator in a will? (British Columbia, Canada)
