What is the burden of proving that Victoria is a child of the marriage to the Respondent?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kumpula v. Kumpula, 2013 BCSC 396 (CanLII):

Since Victoria has reached the age of majority, the onus is on the respondent to prove that she remains a “child of the marriage”: Classen v. Anima, 2011 BCSC 868 at para. 6.

Other Questions


What is the burden of proving that an adult child remains a child of the marriage? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proof for a parent who alleges their child remains a child of the marriage? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a party to a child was not aware of the consequences of the child’s parents’ actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for proving that the child is still a child of the marriage at the time of the application? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a child is attending school away from home, is the child's child entitled to child support? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the child of the marriage still considered to be a Child of the Marriage? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a child of the marriage unilaterally terminated their relationship with the payor parent without good cause and there is evidence that the child is no longer a child, is this a factor in the finding that they no longer exist? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a child who has reached the age of majority but attends post-secondary school remains a child of the marriage and is entitled to child support? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a three year hiatus from school constitute a three-year hiatus for a child of the marriage to be reinstated as a Child of the Marriage? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of establishing that an adult child attending post-secondary education is a child of the marriage? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.