In summary, when considering what will be gained and lost by the child, the best interests of the child are better met by her being in the care of the mother in Winnipeg than remaining in the father’s care in London. In other words, I find that the child’s needs are more likely to be best served by her returning to the mother’s care and this consideration offsets the reduction in contact with the father that will as a result occur: see Gordon v. Goertz, 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27, at para. 25.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.