This principle may not apply in Hague Convention cases where the best interests of the child are compromised by postponing the determination of the children’s best interests in the country where they are habitually resident: J.P.B. v. C.B., at para. 33. Things are different, however, in non-Hague Convention cases. There can be no assumption that a non-signatory state will determine parenting rights based on the children’s best interests: Geliedan v. Radwah, 2020 ONCA 254, at paras. 37 and 38. I am persuaded that in non-Hague Convention cases where a stay of a return order is sought, the primary consideration in assessing irremediable harm is the risk of irremediable prejudice to the children.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.