What is the test for corroborative evidence in a child protection case?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Lucyk v. Clark, 1945 CanLII 182 (SK CA):

Authority is not lacking to show that corroboration can properly be founded upon a probability, though not upon a suspicion. Thus in Burbury v. Jackson [1917] 1 K.B. 16, 86 L.J.K.B. 255, it was held that the corroborative evidence of misconduct required in the Bastardy Laws Amendment Act, 1872, ch. 65 (Imp.) which is in pari materia with The Child Welfare Act, must be evidence tending to show at least probability of misconduct having taken place. The mere opportunity for misconduct is not sufficient.

Other Questions


What is the case law on corroborative evidence in a sexual assault case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for granting access to the child to the father of the child after the child has been adopted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can the biological father of a child be notified of the adoption of the child prior to the child being adopted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that a union has no case law or case law relating to contested positions? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for corroborative evidence in a criminal case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the impact of the misconduct of the wife in the context of a child protection case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for admissible evidence of a child’s statement to her mother alleging sexual assault? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When can natural parents of an adopted child regain contact with their adopted child? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the legal test for admitting fresh evidence in a personal injury case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that deals with title to a property? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.