What are the consequences of a jury's acquittal and conviction of an appellant for a firearm offence?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Switzer, 1987 ABCA 23 (CanLII):
After a five day trial, Mr. Justice Andrekson acquitted the appellant of attempted murder, but convicted her of the other three offences. This appeal relates only to the firearm offence under Section 83 (1) (a) of the Criminal Code. The conviction under that section, it is said, offends the rule enunciated in Kienapple v. The Queen (1974) 1974 CanLII 14 (SCC), 15 C.C.C. (2d) 524.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a defendant who has been convicted of a criminal offence be liable for damages arising out of the same criminal offence? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a plaintiff appeal his conviction for sexual assault against a jury? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the difference between a criminal offence and a regulatory offence? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the relevant case law on summary conviction and summary conviction? (Alberta, Canada)
Can an applicant for a firearms licence be found to possess a firearm within 16 months of being made subject to a peace bond because of domestic violence? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for appeal against convictions on convictions for sexual assault? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a jury or jury decide an action against a doctor? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the consequences of an acquittal on the grounds of insanity? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a trial can be conveniently conducted by a jury? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the consequences of misrepresentation in a statement of present fact with future consequences? (Alberta, Canada)
