Is there an absence of juristic reason for enrichment?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Smith v. Varsanyi, 1995 CanLII 9009 (AB QB):

That leaves for determination whether or not there was an absence of juristic reason for the enrichment. In Peter v. Beblow, supra, Cory J. stated at p. 1018 that: When a claimant is under no obligation contractual, statutory or otherwise to provide the work and services to the recipient, there will be an absence of juristic reasons for the enrichment.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a juristic reason exists to justify enrichment? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable use of the word “reasonable person” in a civil matter? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a public policy reason in support of enrichment where domestic services have been provided in common law? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a contract between the parties constitute a juristic reason? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of care of a reasonably competent surgeon? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a motion for a declaration proceed in the absence of any other remedy for the respondents in the context of a breach of their Charter of Charter Rights? (Alberta, Canada)
If a child objects to return to the parent that has abducted or wrongfully retained the child, does the child's desire to remain with the parent be considered an acceptable reason for objection? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the duty of an architect to his client and to estimate costs fairly and reasonably? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a trial judge be barred from proceeding on the principle that a reasonable apprehension of bias exists? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the argument that negligence or lack of care on the part of a visitor relieves the occupier of his duty to make the premises reasonably safe? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.