What is the test for determining whether a juristic reason exists to justify enrichment?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Alberta Treasury Branches v. Baker (Estate of), 2002 ABQB 781 (CanLII):
Peter v. Beblow contemplates and emphasizes the importance that public policy and public expectation play when deciding whether a juristic reason exists to justify the enrichment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a person can be found guilty of fraud by reason of misusing money given to him as a gift? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether settlement or accord and satisfaction exist? (Alberta, Canada)
What factors are considered to be determinative in determining whether a medical malpractice case is successful or unsuccessful? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a servient driver has the onus to prove that the dominant driver is driving at a reasonable rate? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the principles used to determine whether a fiduciary relationship exists? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test to determine whether a claim can be conveniently heard and determined by a jury? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there an absence of juristic reason for enrichment? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has made all reasonable efforts to establish the identity of the driver? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the factors used to determine whether a spouse has a reasonable chance of surviving a long-term disability? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a police officer’s belief in using force was objectively reasonable? (Alberta, Canada)
