How did Terasen respond to information about 200 mm of ground movement in relation to a revised bridge crossing?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Terasen Gas Inc. v. Utzig Holdings (B.C.) Ltd. (No. 2), 2010 BCSC 1225 (CanLII):

Terasen’s subsequent approval of the revised bridge crossing, and its receipt of the information about 200 mm of ground movement, were described as follows in Terasen v. Utzig #1 at paras. 71‑73:

Other Questions


Is there any case law where evidence relating to one count in an Information is inadmissible in relation to another count? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the grounds for spousal support for a 58-year-old man who, as a result of a long-term relationship with the respondent, has assets that exceed that of the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that the respondent did not expect the respondent to pay for the domestic services provided by the Respondent have any impact on an unjust enrichment claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent responded to an application for a change in parenting time? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a respondent respond to an application with a sur-reply responding to new issues raised in reply? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent dealt with a default judgment in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order costs in favour of the respondent against the respondent by counterclaim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a Respondent have accepted the jurisdiction of the Court as a result of the Respondent's failure to attend the hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an initial and comprehensive settlement offer made by the respondent and a revised offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What defines an informed person and what defines that informed person? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.