What is the standard of review applicable to findings of fact by the Assistant Commissioner of Public Prosecutions?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Poulin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2004 FC 769 (CanLII):

The standard of review applicable to findings of fact by the Assistant Commissioner is that of patent unreasonableness (Tehrankari v. Canada (Correctional Service), 2000 CanLII 15218 (FC), [2000] F.C.J. No. 495, paragraph 44 (Trial Division)(QL)).

Other Questions


What is the applicable standard of review for findings of credibility? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision under the Public Prosecutions Reform Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision by a Public Prosecutions Officer (PRRA) not to be reviewed because it is considered "globally and as a whole"? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision by a Public Prosecutions Officer? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review and what is the deference required to review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to a decision of review on a pure question of fact such as whether a marriage is bona fide? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable in a judicial review of a visa officer's decision? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Reviewable on the standard of reasonableness of a Public Prosecutions Reviewable? (Canada (Federal), Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.