What is the test for a party to proceed in a peremptory order?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Jourdain v. Ontario, 2008 CanLII 22130 (ON SC):
In Symbol Yachts v. Canada, the court noted that there is a presumption that the party ought not to be allowed to proceed following a breach of a peremptory order and that such conduct is generally considered do be contumelious in nature.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If a successful party accepts an offer to settle, can the successful party be ordered to pay all or part of the unsuccessful party’s costs? (Ontario, Canada)
If a party has delayed obtaining a spousal and/or child support order while trying to negotiate a settlement with the other party, is the recipient of that support order entitled to the recipient? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a judge order a non-dissipation order against the property of a party in a family law action? (Ontario, Canada)
When will a court order an interim order to place a temporary order on a temporary parent? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the obligation of a party moving for an order that will affect the rights of the absent party to make full and fair disclosure of all material facts? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a statement by one party that there is an inability to communicate with the other party preclude a joint custody order? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the consequences of a Director's Delegate's Order and Order to quash or to set aside or quash the two orders and decisions? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court order that an earlier proceeding be stayed until the completion of the later proceeding is completed? (Ontario, Canada)
Is it an abuse of the court’s process for a party to bring multiple legal proceedings against the same party in the same matter? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the term "support order" need to be changed to include "support orders" in the definition of a support order? (Ontario, Canada)
