How have courts interpreted s.40(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Chiips Inc. v. Skyview Hotels Limited, 1994 ABCA 243 (CanLII):

This reasoning was adopted and applied by Philp J. in Royal Bank v. Gabriel at p. 309. There is no other reasonable interpretation of s.40 but that in order to enforce a subordination agreement, the subsequent creditor need not be a party to the contract.

Other Questions


Does the Court have any authority to transfer proceedings under R.12 from the Court of Appeal to the Superior Court? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the provisions of section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a fire insurance contract? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a lack of guilty intent as an excuse for the publishing of an article by a newpaper when the material was prejudicial to the court proceedings? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the proviso of an accident policy in respect of death by accident or violence? (Alberta, Canada)
Does s. 42(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Code require that there be a redemption period and what is the redemption period? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.