Is it reasonable to assume that the same land, year in and year out, will produce the same results?

British Columbia, Canada

The following excerpt is from Seaport Crown Fish Co. Ltd v. Vancouver Port Corporation, 1999 CanLII 6261 (BC SC):

As in Haack v. Martin, supra, in which the court considered that it was not unreasonable to assume that the same land, year in and year out, would produce the same results, I consider that it is not unreasonable to assume that the recent financial experience of Seaport for its traditional business would project to the future.

Other Questions

Is an easement necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of land granted by an owner of land and retains other parts himself? (Ontario, Canada)
Is it reasonable for a payor parent to assume full-time employment rather than a part-time position? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to “turn over every stone” in order to identify the other party that is highly unlikely to produce any results? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a half hour sweep schedule reasonable in a high risk produce section of a grocery store? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the owner of land adjoining the railway right-of-way and such land recover damages from a defect in the fence between the right of way and the land adjacent to the railway? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable grounds for establishing that reasonable grounds are reasonable grounds? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the fact that the federal authorities had a duty in exercising their powers over reserve land to endeavour to serve the best interests of the band for whom the land was held require emphasis? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a property owner to continue to use the land where the use of the land is governed by two separate provisions? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for damages for breach of a contract where the contract price of a parcel of land was significantly lower than the value of the land at the time the contract was signed? (British Columbia, Canada)