Is it reasonable to assume that the same land, year in and year out, will produce the same results?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Seaport Crown Fish Co. Ltd v. Vancouver Port Corporation, 1999 CanLII 6261 (BC SC):
As in Haack v. Martin, supra, in which the court considered that it was not unreasonable to assume that the same land, year in and year out, would produce the same results, I consider that it is not unreasonable to assume that the recent financial experience of Seaport for its traditional business would project to the future.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for the argument that appeal is from a result not a reason but a reason? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the common law duty of a dominant driver not to exercise their right of way if the result will be a collision which was reasonably foreseeable and reasonably avoidable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons given in reasons delivered in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is reasonable notice of action for a 46-year-old employee who has been terminated as a result of a breach of discipline? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of reasonableness for using the term “reasonable” in a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the presumption of resulting trust in a purchase money resulting trust? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an interim agreement that states that payments were to be made as a result of the division of lands be paid? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who has not produced evidence in favour of their position, or has no reasonable explanation for failing to call the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
