What is the common law duty of a dominant driver not to exercise their right of way if the result will be a collision which was reasonably foreseeable and reasonably avoidable?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Johel v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2012 BCSC 166 (CanLII):

The common law imposes a corollary duty on dominant drivers not to exercise their right of way if the result will be a collision which was reasonably foreseeable and reasonably avoidable (see Walker v. Brownlee, [1952] D.L.R. 450 (S.C.C.)).

Other Questions


In a collision where a dominant driver has a view of the intersection blocked by a stationary bus, can the dominant driver be found to be contributorily negligent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the duty of a servient driver in a collision involving a dominant driver to prevent a collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a dominant driver required to anticipate breaches by other drivers to avoid a collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a dominant driver be found contributorily negligent in a collision involving a servient driver? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the common law duty of a dominant driver to take reasonable care when driving at high speed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a driver required to anticipate another driver’s actions to avoid a collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a dominant driver required to take extraordinary steps to avoid a collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the conditions that must be met by the court to exercise the right to exercise a personal injury right? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there nothing reasonably prudent driver could have done to avoid the collision between a motorcyclist and a pedestrian? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a dominant driver entitled to continue on if the left-turning driver has the right-of-way? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.