What are the factors available for the defence to argue that remand is not a "preferable place" for sentencing?

Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada


The following excerpt is from R v Myers, 2011 CanLII 50139 (NL PC):

All of these features are available for the defence to argue these matters as mitigating factors in sentencing under reasoning set out in R v. Johnson. The issue of the differences between conditions for remand prisoners and sentenced prisoners is part of the assessment of the qualitative effects of remand, and is an interesting one.

Other Questions


What is the current range of sentences available to future judges? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is a declaratory remedy available without a cause of action available? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for sentencing a single offender to two consecutive sentences? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the purpose of sentencing under section 718 of the Criminal Code of Canada? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is it an established exception to use of privileged correspondence to prove confirmation in response to a limitations defence? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the defence of necessity in the context of an incident where a truck driver refused to wait for over an hour to get materials from a distribution depot? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
How does the defence of mistake apply to a strict liability offence? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for giving credit for time spent in pre-sentence custody for sexual assault? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the range of sentences for spitting on a correctional officer? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the impact of addiction on the sentence of a convicted drug offender? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.