The court “must take into account all substantial possibilities and give them weight according to how likely they are to occur, in light of all the evidence”: Parypa at para. 67. The court must further consider all appropriate contingencies, both positive and negative, general and specific: Djukic v. Hahn, 2006 BCSC 154 [Djukic] at paras. 104 to 108 (aff’d 2007 BCCA 203). General contingencies include “the potential for improvement in health, opportunities for advancement and the ‘usual chances and hazards of life.’ [citation omitted]”: Djukic para. 105.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.