Can a non-tortious precondition be taken into account in assessing contingencies in a medical malpractice case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Barnes v. Richardson et al., 2008 BCSC 1349 (CanLII):

An asymptomatic non-tortious precondition, while not relevant to causation, may be taken into account in assessing contingencies: Larwill v. Lanham, 2003 BCCA 629, 190 B.C.A.C. 13 at para. 22. If there is a measurable risk that the pre-existing condition would have detrimentally affected the plaintiff in the future, regardless of the defendant’s negligence, this can be taken into account in reducing the overall award: Athey at para. 35.

Other Questions


What is the test for assessing all contingencies in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing a plaintiff’s general contingencies in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the entire agreement clause in a medical malpractice case apply to all medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on non-pecuniary damages in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have medical and/or legal opinions been interpreted in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal basis for medical justification in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care of the medical staff in the context of medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required by the Canadian Medical Association in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on the validity of evidence in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the disposition of a medical malpractice case at a medical review board? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.