In Cox v. Darling, Justice Sherr of the Ontario Court of Justice noted that “Courts need to be very cautious in permitting temporary moves in mobility cases because the child-focused inquiry required under Gordon v. Goertz, supra, is very difficult, if not impossible, to accomplish on the conflicting affidavits that one receives in these cases.” Sherr J. stated further in the same paragraph that “courts do not like to create disruptions in the lives of children by making an order that, if later reversed, will result in further disruption.” [cites omitted]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.