What are the principles the court should consider on an adjournment application?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Gagne v Armstrong, 2020 BCSC 2118 (CanLII):

The parties agree there are numerous factors to be considered on an adjournment application. Navarro v. Doig River First Nation, 2015 BCSC 2173, sets out the principles the court should consider.

Other Questions


How have courts considered the interests of justice in deciding whether to adjourn an adjournment application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for an application to compel the Court to consider a number of principles on an application? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the legal principles to be considered on an adjournment application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles to be considered on an application of particulars? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff bring an application for an adjournment, mid trial, despite previous rulings denying adjournments? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances has the Court considered an application to set aside the ex parte joinder of Bavaria? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the applicable rules and principles where an offer to settle is considered? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court consider 4 costs considerations? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.