However, the defendant argued that the plaintiff must first meet the test for varying a child support order, or varying a separation agreement, and as such, must prove a material change in circumstances since the date of the Separation Agreement. The defendant also relied on the proposition that on a variation application, the court must pay considerable deference to the contractual arrangements made by the parties: Miglin v. Miglin, 2003 SCC 24. These positions seem somewhat contradictory, given that the Separation Agreement itself did not require a material change in circumstances as a condition of the review.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.