The plaintiff appears to have pursued the second evaluation out of excessive caution. That does not justify the expense being borne by the defendants. Viewed objectively, it was not reasonable (at the time or at all) to incur this expense for the purpose of the proceeding and, in particular, to prove the plaintiff’s total disability: McKenzie v. Darke 2003 BCSC 138.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.