Can a plaintiff who does not provide full disclosure of relevant medical information to the doctor providing the medical-legal report be denied costs?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cairns v. Gill, 2011 BCSC 420 (CanLII):

In Bagasbas v. Atwal, 2009 BCSC 793, Satanove J. held that a plaintiff who did not provide full disclosure of relevant medical information to the doctor providing the medical-legal report was not entitled to costs, pursuant to Rule 14-1(10):

Other Questions


In a medical malpractice case, is a doctor permitted to refer to a patient’s medical chart containing information that is not relevant to the patient? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a medical-legal report too long? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal obligation of a doctor to provide a patient with sufficient information about a proposed treatment or procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the materiality of the legal advice required to justify disclosure of privileged information? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a plaintiff was denied damages or costs by a Respondent who had continued his adulterous relationship with the Respondent? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to medical malpractice compensation even without objective evidence from her doctor? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action obtain costs from a private legal aid scheme? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a spouse have a duty to make full and honest disclosure of all relevant financial information in a Divorce Agreement? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court order a copy of an independent medical report from a private doctor only be obtained in writing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to claim damages for not following a course of medical treatment recommended to her by her doctor? (British Columbia, Canada)