As the court stated in Lynch v. Segal,[16] for a vesting order to be granted, “…the court will need to be satisfied that the previous conduct of the person obliged to pay, and his or her reasonably anticipated future behaviour indicate that the payment order will not likely be complied with in the absence of more intrusive provisions.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.