In Braich v. Braich (1995), 1 C.P.C. (4th) 375 (B.C.S.C.), Kirkpatrick J. considered the suitability of Rule 18A when faced with similar issues. She referred to the conflicting parenting proposals as well as the “temptation” to reach a “superficial conclusion” that the parties were unlikely ever to communicate in a manner that would serve the best interests of the children. Kirkpatrick J. then concluded that it would be unjust and unsafe for her to do so solely on the basis of the conflicting affidavit evidence before her.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.