What is the suitability of Rule 18A when faced with conflicting affidavit evidence?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from MacDonald v. MacDonald, 2001 BCSC 305 (CanLII):

In Braich v. Braich (1995), 1 C.P.C. (4th) 375 (B.C.S.C.), Kirkpatrick J. considered the suitability of Rule 18A when faced with similar issues. She referred to the conflicting parenting proposals as well as the “temptation” to reach a “superficial conclusion” that the parties were unlikely ever to communicate in a manner that would serve the best interests of the children. Kirkpatrick J. then concluded that it would be unjust and unsafe for her to do so solely on the basis of the conflicting affidavit evidence before her.

Other Questions


When faced with conflicting affidavits in a summary trial, can a judge make a decision between two opposing versions of the affidavit? (British Columbia, Canada)
When faced with conflicting evidence, what is the role of a judge in determining who is more convincing on the witness stand? (British Columbia, Canada)
How do conflicts in expert evidence affect the suitability of a summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it appropriate to re-open a hearing to receive oral evidence in cases of conflicting evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a family case where there are conflicting affidavit evidence, can the court proceed summarily? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there conflicting affidavit evidence on a Rule 18A motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of inadmissible evidence in an affidavit? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a chambers judge obliged to remit a case to the trial list just because there are conflicting affidavits? (British Columbia, Canada)
When faced with contradictory evidence in a preliminary application, is it necessary to proceed to hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is affidavit evidence admissible in a motor vehicle prohibition application? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.