When faced with contradictory evidence in a preliminary application, is it necessary to proceed to hearing?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Hein v. Tyam Construction, 2010 BCHRT 269 (CanLII):

She submits that as stated in Bell v. Sherk and others, 2003 BCHRT 63, in a preliminary application, when faced with contradictory evidence raising issues of credibility that cannot be resolved, it is necessary that the complaint proceed to hearing, where the evidence can be weighed in its entirety.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will a preliminary application to dismiss be dismissed on the basis of contemporaneous documentary evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a de novo hearing for an application for an IPO proceed before the same judge who granted the ex-parte order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the argument made on behalf of the accused on an application for a preliminary hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it appropriate to re-open a hearing to receive oral evidence in cases of conflicting evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application for an extension of time for a review of an application under the Access to Proceeds of Justice Act, BCSC 2220? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge have a duty to hear an application where the adjudicator of the application has been found in error? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an application to reopen a trial to hear further evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can defence counsel call evidence at a preliminary hearing under section 541 of the Criminal Code? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for an applicant to prove a breach of the standard of care with expert evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an application under R. 9-7 is made, does the applicant have to adduce all evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.