On the other hand, in Toronto Dominion Bank v. Scandu Systems Ltd. et al (unreported), February 28, 1984, No. 8498, Kamloops (S.C.), the court held that where there is conflicting affidavit evidence on a Rule 18A motion, and the parties have not yet completed the discovery procedures to elicit the whole factual situation, it may be unjust to decide the issues until the completion of discoveries.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.