Is there conflicting affidavit evidence on a Rule 18A motion?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Reddy v. Reddy, 1999 CanLII 5241 (BC SC):

On the other hand, in Toronto Dominion Bank v. Scandu Systems Ltd. et al (unreported), February 28, 1984, No. 8498, Kamloops (S.C.), the court held that where there is conflicting affidavit evidence on a Rule 18A motion, and the parties have not yet completed the discovery procedures to elicit the whole factual situation, it may be unjust to decide the issues until the completion of discoveries.

Other Questions


What is the difference between a no evidence motion and an insufficient evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a motion for a no evidence motion in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to lead expert evidence to overcome a no evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the suitability of Rule 18A when faced with conflicting affidavit evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
When faced with conflicting affidavits in a summary trial, can a judge make a decision between two opposing versions of the affidavit? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a family case where there are conflicting affidavit evidence, can the court proceed summarily? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it appropriate to re-open a hearing to receive oral evidence in cases of conflicting evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an application for a stay of execution of a motion for a motion to quash a motion of appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a chambers judge obliged to remit a case to the trial list just because there are conflicting affidavits? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.