Is detrimental reliance not a necessary element of a claim for pure economic loss?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Westbank Society Seniors Housing Society v. Scuka Enterprises Ltd., 2013 BCSC 2360 (CanLII):

The plaintiffs rely on James v. British Columbia, 2005 BCCA 136 [James] for the proposition that detrimental reliance is not a necessary element of the claim for pure economic loss, except where based on negligent misrepresentation.

Other Questions


Does a claim of negligent misrepresentation or detrimental reliance require detrimental reliance? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reliance not an essential element of a claim for loss of income? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
In assessing future loss of earning capacity for loss of past and future earning capacity, what is the test for a loss of future earnings allowance? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s claim deficient in the element of causation in her claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for loss of enjoyment of life, loss of lifestyle, and loss of amenities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for loss of enjoyment of life, loss of exercise, and loss of access to facilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proof for a plaintiff in a claim for loss of future earnings due to loss of income due to climate change? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a person can claim damages for loss of income due to the loss of employment benefits? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a disability claim deductible from a loss of earning capacity claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.