Is reliance not an essential element of a claim for loss of income?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Burke v. Watson & Barnard (A Firm), 2016 BCCA 439 (CanLII):

Burke responds that reliance is not an essential element of her claim. Pointing to James v. British Columbia, she contends her economic loss arises from negligent performance of a service and reliance is not a required constituent for this cause of action.

Other Questions


Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is detrimental reliance not a necessary element of a claim for pure economic loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a claim of negligent misrepresentation or detrimental reliance require detrimental reliance? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s claim deficient in the element of causation in her claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party’s income for income tax purposes considered income for purposes of determining child support obligations? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a self-employed real estate agent who receives income through his Personal Preference Tax Credit (PTC) entitled to income from a spouse's pre-tax income? (British Columbia, Canada)
Are expenses claimed against commission income or self-employment income for child and spousal support purposes? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for advancing a claim under a plaintiff’s right to claim for diminished income? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff can claim damages for loss of income as a result of a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the elements required to establish a claim of negligent misrepresentation? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.