The plaintiff’s burden of proof related to actual past events must meet the standard of a balance of probabilities. Assessing the loss of both past and future earning capacity involves a consideration of hypothetical events; the plaintiff is not required to prove these to the standard of a balance of probabilities: Rousta v. MacKay, 2018 BCCA 29 at paras. 14, 17 [Rousta]. Instead, the standard for the proof for hypothetical past events, like hypothetical future events will be taken into consideration as long as it is a real and substantial possibility and not mere speculation. These will be given weight according to their relative likelihood: Athey at paras. 27, 28.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.