Is pandering a "one act" crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Robinson, G048941 (Cal. App. 2015):

Our analysis under section 27 follows a similar track. As noted above, that statute is satisfied if the subject offense was committed in whole or in part in California. It is true that pandering has been described as a "one-act offense," given it is technically accomplished when the defendant procures a person for the purpose of prostitution. (People v. White (1979) 89 Cal.App.3d 143, 151 (White).) That description would also fit the crime of human trafficking under section 236.1, subdivision (c), since it focuses on the act of inducing a minor to engage in prostitution. But while the acts of procuring and inducing are sufficient to trigger liability, it does not mean these crimes are over when those acts initially occur. Rather, courts have treated these crimes as continuous, ongoing offenses in a variety of contexts.

Other Questions


When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the target crime? (California, United States of America)
Is a charged crime a natural and probable consequence of the target crime if the charged crime was reasonably foreseeable? (California, United States of America)
Is a lesser included crime to another crime where both crimes are charged? (California, United States of America)
What is the law on unanimity in a criminal case where the evidence of a crime is only a single crime but the evidence supports the theory of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is convicted of receiving stolen property in one crime, but never charged or convicted of the other crime, be required to pay restitution for losses sustained in other crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is a person who aids or abets a crime liable for the crime if the original crime was committed independently by another person? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.